An independent, nonpartisan record of every U.S. tariff and the revenue it generates.

Tariff Tracker pulls live customs and trade data from Treasury, Census, and the Federal Register, presented exactly as the government publishes it; daily, with full historical context back to January 2025.

Updated each business dayOpen data, public sourcesNo advertising, no tracking
Total Tariff Revenue · Jan 2025 – April 2026iCent-accurate cumulative figure from the U.S. Treasury's Monthly Treasury Statement (Table 4, Customs Duties line). Reflects net receipts after refunds and drawbacks.
$362,659,333,310.97
+$23.9B since April 2026 (provisional · all customs receipts)iFrom the Daily Treasury Statement. Bundles Customs Duties with Merchandise Processing Fee and Harbor Maintenance Tax, so this figure is slightly broader than the MTS number above. Updates each business day.
Today's Customs Receipts
$348M
▼ -$33M vs prior business day
Month-to-Date Revenue
$348M
June 2026
Calendar YTD Revenue
$122,509M
YTD 2026
Tariffed Product LinesiCount of HTS codes carrying an active trade-action surcharge (Section 232, Section 301, executive surcharges, etc.). A 'product line' is one 10-digit HTS code. Placeholder figure pending Yale Budget Lab effective-rate parsing.
8,217
of 29,583 total product lines

1912 vs Today

What would tariffs need to be today to fund the federal government on the 1912 revenue mix; the last time before the income tax? This is the revenue math applied to today's spending, not a forecast or recommendation.

1912: the last budget before the income tax

FY ended June 30, 1912

In fiscal year 1912, the last full year before the 16th Amendment authorized a federal income tax, the government took in $692.6 million and spent $689.9 million; leaving the budget essentially balanced, and doing so without an income tax. Revenue came mostly from two sources: customs duties (tariffs) at 45%, and internal revenue via excise taxes, (chiefly on alcohol and tobacco) at 47%, with the remaining 8% from miscellaneous receipts.

What it funded

  • War Department (Army)23.4%
  • Navy Department19.7%
  • Military pensions (mainly Civil War veterans)22.3%
  • Other civil functions28.5%
  • Interest on the public debt3.3%
  • Indian affairs2.9%

No Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, federal student loans, or most modern civil agencies existed. Civil War veterans’ pensions were the largest civilian outlay.

Customs duties (tariffs) · 45%Internal revenue (excise) · 47%Miscellaneous receipts · 8%

Today, by fiscal year

FY2025 actuals
Abolishing the individual income tax and matching the 1912 mix, tariffs would need to be
$2.16 trillion
about 11× current customs revenue ($194.9B). Total spending this period: $7.01T.
If you abolish…Income tax replacedRevenue neededTariffs would need to be
Individual income tax only$2.66T$4.81T$2.16T
Individual + corporate income tax$3.11T$5.26T$2.36T
Individual + corporate + payroll$4.86T$7.01T$3.15T

“Revenue needed” is total spending minus the income/payroll taxes you keep. The 1912 mix would split it 45% tariffs / 47% excise / 8% miscellaneous; the final column shows the tariff share. For the top row, that mix also implies excise of $2.24T (vs $105.9B today) and miscellaneous of $408.3B.

Today, trailing 12 months

Trailing 12 months through April 2026
Abolishing the individual income tax and matching the 1912 mix, tariffs would need to be
$2.22 trillion
about current customs revenue ($324.3B). Total spending this period: $7.12T.
If you abolish…Income tax replacedRevenue neededTariffs would need to be
Individual income tax only$2.74T$4.93T$2.22T
Individual + corporate income tax$3.13T$5.32T$2.39T
Individual + corporate + payroll$4.93T$7.12T$3.20T

“Revenue needed” is total spending minus the income/payroll taxes you keep. The 1912 mix would split it 45% tariffs / 47% excise / 8% miscellaneous; the final column shows the tariff share. For the top row, that mix also implies excise of $2.29T (vs $105.1B today) and miscellaneous of $418.4B.

This is the mathematical answer; what the revenue math requires to fund current spending on the 1912 mix. Whether tariffs at that level are achievable or desirable is a separate question this tool does not address, and 1912’s context differs from today’s. We present the math; you draw the conclusion. For sources and method, see our methodology page.